Join Now!      Login

Whole Person Wellness Program
 
healthy.net Wellness Model
Skip Navigation Links
 
 
FREE NEWSLETTER
   
   
   
 
Health Centers
Key Services
 
Medicial Mistakes?
How many people each year suffer some type of preventable harm that contributes to their death after a hospital visit?
from 46,000 to 78,000
from 78,000 to 132,000
from 132,000 to 210,000
from 210,000 to 440,000

 
 

 Columnist Taylor Walsh: A response to the Atlantic Monthly's The Triumph of New Age Medicine 
 
The following is one in an ongoing series of columns entitled Integrator Blog by . View all columns in series
Summary: When Integrator columnist Taylor Walsh spotted the Atlantic Monthly feature by David Freedman, The Triumph of New Age Medicine, he recognized what is certain to be an influential contribution to the nation's debate over medical alternatives. Walsh culls exceptional quotes from Freedman and his subjects on a ride that enters what Walsh calls the Quackadarium and includes Mayo Clinic's integrative care and Brian Berman's center at U Maryland. This Cliff's Notes version of an exceptional article will drive you to read the original.


Related Integrator Article:
_________________________



Image
Opening photo from the Atlantic feature
Integrator columnist Taylor Walsh alerted me via email to a feature in the July-August 2011 Atlantic Monthly by David H. Freedman entitled "The Triumph of New Age Medicine." Walsh mentioned that the writer was he same fellow who had explore John Ioannidis' deconstruction of the claims of medical researchers. Before reading Freedman's piece I urged him to write up something. He did. Before I read Walsh's remarks, I read Freedman's piece, then wrote a separate column. Walsh's comments are below. Mine will be linked here when posted.

Walsh, a regular Integrator contributor, is a consultant, entrepreneur and writer on digital media and integrative health. His own blog is at Getting to Integrative Health and Wellness. Walsh tweets on related topics via @taylorw.

___________________________________


Comments on "The Triumph of New Age Medicine"

- Taylor Walsh

Image
Taylor Walsh
This article is an important appraisal of the view of the future that the integrative medicine and practice communities can now see before them; even as integrative medicine itself has in recent weeks come under some conservative media skepticism from Forbes magazine and The Economist.


It is important because once you pass through the expected but decreasingly dense tangle of skepticism, writer David H. Freedman is able to highlight and describe in comprehensible fashion the aspects of integrative medicine and practice that have sustained their advancement and will continue to do so. 

As a journalist, Freedman is interested in burrowing into the general assumptions of professional cultures whose work has great reach and great consequence. He wrote the book, "Wrong: Why Experts Keep Failing Us-And How to Know When Not to Trust Them."  Last November Atlantic published his eye-opening account on the work of meta researcher John Ioannides, MD, whose examinations of medical research in the 1990's exposed a dysfunctional system and unreliable results (conditions that inspired in part the program for Comparative Effectiveness Research managed through Institute of Medicine in 2009 as part of the American Recovery Act).

Freedman's starting premise appears to be the question, "How come alternative medicine is still here?"

   
" Freedman highlights in comprehensible fashion
the aspects of integrative medicine and practice
that have sustained their advancement
and will continue to do so."


   
From an integrative practice point of view the article has a number of problems and for the general reader includes several unnecessary distractions, starting with the title phrase "New Age Medicine." That phrase still retains its powerful connotation for things way out of the mainstream: tie-dyes, a perpetual daze, the 60s, and now marijuana clinics lining California strip malls.

Freedman also makes the decision to use "alternative medicine" throughout. "Alternative" is an "instead of" term, which immediately sets the integrative and "real" medical communities on opposite sides of the room. Had he used "complementary" the story would be more easily digested by the general reader and it would more accurately describe the current state of integrative and conventional relations. (Thus another vote for complementary and integrative?)

It isn't helpful, for instance, to suggest that a representative example of current integrative treatment might include "hologrammed silicone bracelets."  But there it is, to capture the mind's eye of the general reader.

So his story rolls out a little unevenly.  It is not unlike following a mosaic stretching through a gallery of 30 rooms, the walls of each revealing a little more of an unfolding theme.  

Which means, as is most often the case for this topic, the gallery trip must stop in the obligatory Quackaderium, where skeptics rain down aspersions on the intention and motivation of CAIM professions and on the "gullible" public to whom they are "marketing." (Freedman eventually sets these assertions against the prevailing realities, but I wondered how many readers would reach this passage on page 3 and think "just more of the same," and go back to email.)

   
   
"As is most often the case for this topic,
the gallery trip must stop in the obligatory
Quackaderium
, where skeptics rain down
aspersions on the intention and motivation
of CAIM professions.


But on balance, the trip through Freedman's gallery, reveals a collection of fairly drawn portraits: on the questions of evidence and the apparent omnipresence of the placebo; the inadequacy of RCTs; the loss of healing sensibilities among physicians; real patients he observes in treatment; and the depth of integrative acceptance in the most well known conventional care institutions. You'll have your own highlights; here are a few:

  • "To focus on alternative medicine's placebo effect ignores what may be its largest benefit-its adherence to a ‘healing' model of patient care."

  • "The medical community knows perfectly well what sort of patient-care model would work better against complex diseases... the promotion of a healthy diet, encouragement of more exercise, and measures to reduce stress."

  • "Every single physician I spoke with agreed: the current system makes it nearly impossible for most doctors to have the sort of relationship with patients that would best promote health."

  •  "A medical system that successfully guided patients toward healthier lifestyles would almost certainly see its cash flow diminish dramatically."

  • "Other sorts of professionals could be better at the healing, bonding ... and for less money. These might include behavioral-medicine therapists, social workers, nurse practitioners, or even some entirely new sort of practitioner specially trained for the task." 

  • "But what's the sham treatment for being a caring practitioner, focused on getting a patient to adopt healthier attitudes and behaviors?"  Citing UC Davis neuroscientist Clifford Saron: ‘...Science has to learn to listen in a sophisticated way to what individuals report to us.'"

  • "Ultimately, what today's medical students think about alternative medicine will be more important to the future of medicine than what anyone else thinks of it."

Eventually the trip through the Freedman gallery takes him into the Mayo Clinic (literally), where his account of observations, conversations, and commentary reaches a kind of reality crescendo.  He writes: "This notion that alternative medicine is a legitimate response to mainstream medicine's real shortcomings is one I heard, in variations, from everyone I spoke with at the Mayo Clinic."  

   
"Freedman's assessment presents for general
readers a view of a future in which medicine
has been changed substantially, through
integrative practices and attitudes."


  
While all of the above may draw knowing nods among Integrator readers, Freedman's assessment presents for general readers a view of a future in which medicine has been changed substantially, through integrative practices and attitudes that have been experienced and accepted by patients for the last generation.  

While he did not address the growth and maturation of the CAM disciplines, whose work outside the conventional care establishment established the value of their approaches for that gullible public in the first place, he senses that the forthcoming era might require "...even some entirely new sort of practitioner specially trained..." Nodding at that suggestion will be the educators at Tai Sophia Institute's Wellness Coach program, as well as at Duke Integrative Coaching.

A Berman Effect?

For some reason, this article includes the second appearance in a big time publication in as many months for Brian Berman, director of the U of Maryland Medical School's Center for Integrative Medicine in Baltimore. Freedman begins his story in the CIM offices talking to Berman and a few of his patients and colleagues. That makes for an easy transition across campus, where another U of Maryland prof, Steven Salzberg, PhD has set up shop as one of the fiercest critics of all things CAIM.

Last month Salzberg, from his position as a columnist for Forbes.com (also printed in Forbes magazine), began his summary blast at integrative medicine with a barrage aimed at Berman  before moving on to the rest of the academic health center community.

Freedman's conversation with Salzberg about the evidence base for CAIM includes a rather poignant reflection on its comparison to the evidence for psychotherapy. It is a coda to the article worth the wait.
 
Comment: Freedman's article is a fascinating read. Walsh's selection of quotes captures some of its breadth, depth and gravitas. I missed Freedman's fascinating summation of his tour to Mayo, that bastion of evidence-based care: "
This notion that alternative medicine is a legitimate response to mainstream medicine's real shortcomings is one I heard, in variations, from everyone I spoke with at the Mayo Clinic." No wonder the anti-alternatives are blogging against Freedman. Read David Freedman responds to criticism of his CAM apologia and you will see that he hold up well.

I too thought dredging up
"New Age" was inappropriate. This must have been a headline writer, or a marketing ploy. This is not what Freedman favored, which was "alternative medicine." Frankly, I liked this. What Freedman was weighing was what he calls "a healing model of care." Such an approach is fundamentally an alternative. The problems the system has with it is that for reasons of time, payment, practitioner training and clinician preference, it doesn't integrate very well. Maybe it's time to reclaim alternative medicine.

Walsh is right: the coda is exceptional. I was reminded of my Dad's favorite gesture after gotcha moments in debates. A simple twist of the knife. 


Send your comments to johnweeks@theintegratorblog.com
for inclusion in a future Your Comments Forum.
      
 Comments Add your comment 

 About The Author
Resumes are useful in employment decisions. I provide this background so that you may understand what informs the work which you may employ in your own. I have been involved as an organizer-writer in the emerging fields......moreJohn Weeks
 
 From Our Friends
 
 
 
Popular & Related Products
 
Popular & Featured Events
Wellness Inventory Certification Training
     September 16-December 16, 2014
     Teleclass, CA USA
 
Additional Calendar Links
 
Stevia Products & Info
 
Dimensions of Wellness
Wellness, Playing, Working, dimension!

Home       Wellness       Health A-Z       Alternative Therapies       Find a Practitioner       Healthy Products       Bookstore       Wellness Inventory
Healthy Kitchen       Healthy Woman       Healthy Man       Healthy Child       Healthy Aging       Wellness Center       Nutrition Center       Fitness Center
Free Newsletter      What Doctor's Don't Tell You      Stevia.com      Discount Lab Tests      First Aid      Global Health Calendar      Privacy Policy     Contact Us
Disclaimer: The information provided on HealthWorld Online is for educational purposes only and IS NOT intended as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek professional medical advice from your physician or other qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Are you ready to embark on a personal wellness journey with our whole person approach?
Learn More/Subscribe
Are you looking to create or enhance a culture of wellness in your organization?
Learn More
Do you want to become a wellness coach?
Learn More
Free Webinar