Join Now!      Login

Whole Person Wellness Program
 
healthy.net Wellness Model
Skip Navigation Links
 
 
FREE NEWSLETTER
   
   
   
 
Health Centers
Key Services
 
Walking?
Which of the following in NOT a direct benefit of a regular walking regimen?
Reduce Stress
Improved immune function
Achieving ideal weight.
Improved sugar metabolism

 
 

 AMA Escalates Campaign Against Nurses, Chiropractors, Naturopaths, Midwives and Others 
 
The following is one in an ongoing series of columns entitled Integrator Blog by . View all columns in series

RESOLVED, That our AMA advocate that professionals in a clinical health care setting clearly and accurately identify to patients their qualifications and degree(s) attained and develop model state legislation for implementation. (Directive to Take Action)

RESOLVED, That our AMA support state legislation that would make it a felony to misrepresent ones’ self as a physician (MD/DO).


ImageResolutions #204 and #205 - Against homebirth and keeping an eye on Certified Professional Midwives

Resolution 204, Midwifery Scope of Practice and Licensure, urges the AMA to ensure that the only midwives its members should support are those that are represented by the American College of Nurse-Midwives. Even these, however, should be watched closely regarding their scope expansions. Not mentioned in this section in the report from the House of Delegates are the Certified Professional Midwives who
are trained to provide home births but are not nurses. The opposition to home birth is reaffirmed in Resolution 205 which is specifically against "home deliveries."

Resolution #214 - Against the Doctor of Nursing

According to Resolution #214, the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) - the examining board for MDs - has begun "developing a voluntary (Doctor of Nursing Practice-DrNP) certification exam based on the same exams given to medical doctors to obtain their medical license." Such a certification would clarify which nurses might help meet the estimated shortage of 85,000-200,000 primary care providers. NBME was urged not to assist the nurses. Resolution #214 opposes the NBME "participating in any credentialing procedures for Doctors of Nursing, and refrain from producing test questions to certify these DrNP candidates." The Resolution also asserts that DrNPs "must be part of a medical team under the supervision of a licensed MD who has final authority and responsibility for the patient."


Resolution 235: Against physicians warring against other physicians

The rationale the AMA offers for these resolutions is typically protection of the public health, despite the fact, as noted, that evidence is not presented to show harm. It is interesting in this light to look at an additional resolution, also about scope of practice concern. Only here, the target is not nurses, chiropractors, naturopathic physicians, midwives, Doctors of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine or any other field. It seems that in the midst of this flurry of activity to keep the natives from climbing the ramparts, the AMA was discovering that some of their fellows had circled the wagons and begun shooting at each other. Resolution 235 may be dubbed the "Friendly Fire" resolution.

According to Resolution 235, members of one specialty are sometimes deciding that a certain procedure or surgery typically associated with another specialty is within its possible practice scope. This then is apparently stimulating some specialties to seek to protect their privilege by running to their state legislatures to limit the scopes of encroaching specialties. Resolution 235, printed in full below, begins with an honest acknowledgment of the economic issues which are behind all of the activity, of the AMA and of the other, emergent doctoral-level organizations.

____________________________

The "Friendly Fire" Resolution
#235:
Physician Regulation of Other Physicians

AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION HOUSE OF DELEGATES

Whereas, The economics of medicine have put financial pressure on all physicians; and

Whereas, Some medical specialty societies have elected to seek the introduction of state level legislation that regulates or restricts other physicians’ practices; therefore be it

RESOLVED, That our American Medical Association, with the intent of improving patient care and promoting interspecialty collaboration, develop a process for national specialty groups to urge their state affiliates to work through the state medical association prior to the introduction of any state legislation that seeks to regulate or restrict the practice of other physician groups or specialties. (Directive to Take Action)

Fiscal Note: Implement accordingly at estimated staff cost of $10,836.

Received: 06/10/08
____________________________

Image1. Response of the American Association of Naturopathic Physicians


The American Association of Naturopathic Physicians (AANP) sent a news update to their members prior to the AMA's action entitled "AANP Response to AMA Resolution 303." (Note that 303 was later passed as 232 and significantly amended.) The AANP letter begins bluntly
: "The American Medical Association is poised to make a move that could have a huge impact on our ability to call ourselves Naturopathic Doctors." The AANP noted that Resolution 303 "ignores laws already on the books" and it "discounts federal standards." The AMA is "creating a national agenda to ensure the current hierarchy in health care is maintained - regardless of a shortage of primary care practitioners, the obvious need to transcend from disease management to a wellness-based system, and the rising numbers of consumers who are choosing non-conventional treatment."

The AANP's letter,
signed by president Lise Alschuler, ND, NABNO, states that the AMA's moves will "only serve to unfairly penalize legitimately trained providers of primary care services from practicing their trades." The letter then underscores that this agenda is "deeply rooted in an old story and worldview that simply does not reflect today's reality" in which "MDs, NDs and nurses already work side by side, collaborating on patient care in venues across the country."

Note: I have not seen AANP commentary since Resolution 303 was changed and amended. However, the profession clearly asserts the right to be considered "physicians" and also have this as a title right in many jurisdictions.

Image2. American Chiropractic Association Response

The American Chiropractic Association sent out a press release against Resolution 232 on June 21, 2008, after the AMA House of Delegates concluded its meeting. The ACA states that "
under federal statute, all doctors of chiropractic are considered physicians in Medicare and doctors of chiropractic are legally deemed chiropractic physicians in an overwhelming majority of states." Glenn Manceaux, DC, ACA president is quoted: “It is not the role of organized medicine to regulate the titles and terminology used by other providers; it is the responsibility of federal and state legislators to bestow the title of ‘physician.’ As a trade association, the AMA is clearly overstepping its bounds.”

The ACA statement makes two points also made by the AANP, regarding the role of consumers and the potential damage to the growing number of professional relationships that currently exist between their members and medical doctors. The release states: "
Within the chiropractic profession, concern also exists that supporters of the resolution are acting in their own self-interest at the expense of consumers, and that the new policy statement could jeopardize the inter-referral relationships many allied health providers—including doctors of chiropractic—have developed with their MD-counterparts."

ACA, known for its legislative successes against the organized medical profession, urges its state associations to be vigilant. The organization notes that it will be working with two separate coalitions to see that any AMA-backed legislation related to Resolution 232 does not advance.

Image3. Nurses Respond to #303 and #214

In separate letters on June 11, to Craig Anderson, MD, chair of the AMA committee which oversaw the resolutions, the American Nurses Association opposed Resolution #214 and #303. On #303, the ANA made the point, which eventually prevailed (and which the AANP also made), that no profession owns the title "doctor." Hence, they state, the term "medical doctor" was created, to designate what types of doctor. Ditto "medical resident" and "medical residency."

The nurse association then evoked that AMA's most significant loss in its efforts to repress other professions: Wilk v. AMA - in which the chiropractic profession won a 10-year long restraint of trade battle. Said the nurses:
"If the real issue is competition, and this is an effort to make it more difficult for doctorates of nursing to train and practice in the same arena as medical doctors, that would constitute an improper - and possibly illegal - restrain of trade. In Wilk v. AMA, the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit ruled that the AMA cannot "boycott" other healthcare professions, as this would violate the Sherman Antitrust Act. (Wilk v. AMA, 895 F. 2d 352 (7th Cir. 1990)
The opposition to #214 particularly focused on the requirement for supervision by an MD: "State law, state boards of nursing, and the nursing profession itself are the only appropriate entities to regular the practice of nursing." (The American Chiropractic Association made a parallel point.) The ANA clarified further its own Copernican revolution regarding the center of the medical universe: "The medical profession is not the 'starting place' from which all other professions must seek authorization to practice."

In the letter - both were co-signed by Rebecca M. Patton, MSN, RN, CNOR, the ANA's president and Linda Steele, MSN, RN, CNAA, BC, CEO -the ANA points to a 2007 document, developed collaboratively by representatives of six disciplines, including both nursing and medicine, entitled Changes in Healthcare Professions Scope of Practice: Legislative Considerations. The report noted that "it is no longer reasonable to have completely unique scope of practice, exclusive of all others. Overlap among professions is necessary. No one profession actually owns a skill or activity in and of itself."

________________________________________

   CONTINUED      Previous   1  2  3  Next   
 Comments Add your comment 

 About The Author
Resumes are useful in employment decisions. I provide this background so that you may understand what informs the work which you may employ in your own. I have been involved as an organizer-writer in the emerging fields......moreJohn Weeks
 
 From Our Friends
 
 
 
Popular & Related Products
 
Popular & Featured Events
Integrative Healthcare Symposium 2015
     February 19-21, 2015
     New York, NY USA
 
Wellness Inventory Certification Training (Level I)
     February 24-May 26, 2015
     Teleclass, CA USA
 
Additional Calendar Links
 
Stevia Products & Info
 
Dimensions of Wellness
Wellness, Eating, dimension!

Home       Wellness       Health A-Z       Alternative Therapies       Find a Practitioner       Healthy Products       Bookstore       Wellness Inventory
Healthy Kitchen       Healthy Woman       Healthy Man       Healthy Child       Healthy Aging       Wellness Center       Nutrition Center       Fitness Center
Free Newsletter      What Doctor's Don't Tell You      Stevia.com      Discount Lab Tests      First Aid      Global Health Calendar      Privacy Policy     Contact Us
Disclaimer: The information provided on HealthWorld Online is for educational purposes only and IS NOT intended as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek professional medical advice from your physician or other qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Are you ready to embark on a personal wellness journey with our whole person approach?
Learn More/Subscribe
Are you looking to create or enhance a culture of wellness in your organization?
Learn More
Do you want to become a wellness coach?
Learn More
Free Webinar